Posts

Peter Klevius not only defends Union Jack* (despite its piracy birth) against continuous militaristic warmonger desecration, but also enlightens its dark past for the purpose of a possibly brighter future with less Sinophobia**.

Image
*  "Jack" refers to a small flag flown on boats and ships. "Union" refers to when the king of Scotland included England under his rule.   ** Because China has no reason to "pose a threat", but a R&D superiority that no other country or coalition can get even close to (a fact politicians and media either are ignorant about or deliberately hide), then the only reason to push for more "defense" spending is not only shortsighted but also detrimental for the people. After all, this waste of money excludes itself from using Chinese high tech, and therefore will always lie behind. And this doesn't really matter for Western arms companies because the idea for them is just selling as much as possible. This means that people in the West are forced to pay for underwhelming products that will probably never even be used and tested - but of course continue to pay off through endless provocative drills etc. And while US "defense" ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Peter Klevius R&D and $-analysis: West's delusion about China, and US' desperation to share with its "allies" the consequences of its 1971 world $-theft* and continuing embezzlement, constitute the center of geo-politics today.

Image
* The original dollar was European (Spanish) and after 1944 it was made the world dollar pegged to gold, i.e. eqaully anchored against all other currencies. However, because US cheated by living over its means, i.e. printing more dollar for itself than it had corresponding amount of gold, this led to US being unable to deliver gold against dollar on demand. So Nixon just robbed the world dollar by disconnecting its gold pegging while keeping all control over its printing and use. US is the bad guy* and China the good (i.e. normal) one - how could anyone miss to see something so obvious? And don't fool yourself by focusing on Trump when the real problem is US 1971 $-theft. Where Biden stupidly thought he could win over China, Trump knows better but wants to use all US stolen means possible - incl. extorion of "allies" and anti-China campaign - to prolong US inevitable economic and hegemonic collapse. The top duty of the world is now to tell US to behave and s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Peter Klevius geopolitical analysis: US $-theft 1971 + China's success + anti-China lies = Ukraine war*. However, where Obama/Biden wanted to hurt Russia so to weaken China but risking WW3, Trump chose cooperation**.

Image
Peter Klevius wonders why BBC's Anna Foster today applied different propaganda on Turkey compared to Romania? After all in both cases a presidential candidate was eliminated! * 1971 US, on the brink of bankruptcy, violated the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement, and took total dictatorship over the now fiat world dollar. Because of the Cold War and US hegemony, no one dared to protest. And although US then married Saudi islamofascism with the petro-dollar, even that wasn't enough to keep US afloat, so US continued manipulating interest and $-printing in favor of only itself, which move of course sucked its value from the world dollar, leading to enormous pain for the poorest countries, and sent e.g. a growing Latin America into an economic swamp in the 1980s. Similarly a fast growing but equally $-sensitive podt-Maoist China was hit by extreme $-manipulation in the late 1980s, which led to the peaceful protests against higher prices caused by higher interest rates. These protests ca...
Post a Comment
Read more