Peter Klevius not only defends Union Jack* (despite its piracy birth) against continuous militaristic warmonger desecration, but also enlightens its dark past for the purpose of a possibly brighter future with less Sinophobia**.
* "Jack" refers to a small flag flown on boats and ships. "Union" refers to when the king of Scotland included England under his rule. ** Because China has no reason to "pose a threat", but a R&D superiority that no other country or coalition can get even close to (a fact politicians and media either are ignorant about or deliberately hide), then the only reason to push for more "defense" spending is not only shortsighted but also detrimental for the people. After all, this waste of money excludes itself from using Chinese high tech, and therefore will always lie behind. And this doesn't really matter for Western arms companies because the idea for them is just selling as much as possible. This means that people in the West are forced to pay for underwhelming products that will probably never even be used and tested - but of course continue to pay off through endless provocative drills etc. And while US "defense" ...