Biden administration (who murdered* 6 year old Hind Rajab): We MAY stop SOME deliveries of SOME arms related products at SOME point AFTER 30 DAYS if Israel doesn't allow SOME aid.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
* Without US weapons, bombs and support, Israel's massive indiscriminate bombings of civilians would not be possiböe.
The US made "China threat" lie is a real threat to US and European consumers - and world peace. US is a fascist loser sticking to its guns, hating China and committing double* genocide against Palestinians.
* Not only are most weapons and bombs massacring Palestinians delivered (many for free) by $-freeloader US, but US also supports Israel's continuous histoy of illegal occupation and apartheid, as well as Israel's "from the river to the sea variant" in the wake of its unscrupulous murdering and destroying of every part of Palkestinian land. And US calls this the world's worst combination of indiscriminate murdering and land grab "self defense", and US/UK/BBC etc. fully accept something no one accepted before, namely that one is allowed to kill a bunch of civilian if there could possibly be a suspected "terrorist" among them - i.e. a Palestinian soldier defending Palestinians against decades of Israeli terror. However, perhaps it's not surprising that US and UK supports Israel's war crimes. After all, US and UK used the same method in the end of WW2 when US and UK deliberately firebombed easy civilian targets in Germany while the Russians made the real fighting and sacrifices. And US topped it all by not only firebombing Japanese civilians in non-military targets when the war was practically already over, but also had to murder and injure an enornmous amount of civilians by detonating atom bombs over cities - as a test so to see how it worked out.
Acknowledgement: "Islamophobe" Peter Klevius has always stood up for the Universal (negative - i.e. basic) Human Rights, and has therefore also criticized sharia islamism which violates UN's UDHR from 1948. Palestinians and other muslims are humans - not "infidels" - as are Jews and all other humans.
The real danger to the world is that its most derailed enemy, dollar embezzler US, has in its hand not only full control over the world dollar, but also over the world media - (except for in China). US could steer at will how to use all your personal data. And unlike China, US has a reson to criminally utilize its hegemony.
Some picks out of the ocean of US deliberate misinformation propaganda about China
1) When Sunni Uyghur terrorists raped and slaughtered more Chinese (incl. Hui muslims) than Sunni Hamas and (Western backed) Sunni al-Aqsa Brigades, China, instead of indiscriminately bombing civilians, started a deradicalization program allowing girls and women a way out from their sharia imprisonment to education, work and career, this was shamefully called a "human rights violation" and "genocide" (despite OIC had thoroughly checked and then highly praised CCP for its treatment of muslims in China) by US and its puppets who unequivocally support Israels real genocide and war crimes.
2) Hong Kong is part of China but with its own government and laws. It's therefore preposterous to criticize Hong Kong and mainland China for not allowing seditious terrorism that would never be allowed in US.
3) US ruled "rules" of the sea are pathetic. China's demands in South China Sea are much less than could be historically motivated. After all, it was Western attacks (incl. Japan's militaristic imperialism which was also caused by US) that created the mess there. However, long before the West was invented, China ruled the seas of the Pacific and Indian oceans with the world's largest fleet. And if we go even further back, all Austronasians came from Fujian in China where early boat technology made it possible to populate most of the Pacific, starting at least 2,200 BC by reaching the Batanes Islands of the Philippine Archipelago.
4) Due to China being the world's oldest civilization, it has been the mother of other civilizations, e.g. exemplified by Zoroastrianism, Taoism and Konfucianism, which shaped Greek and Mideastern civilizations - albeit sometimes in extremely distorted form as e.g. "the chosen people" "monotheisms").
5) When China's leadership was forced by the Chinese people's Konfuzian respect for the elderly to lock down despite it hurt the economy, US and its puppets spread lies about how the "Communist dictatorship oppressed" the people. And when the leadership wanted to smoothly step by step opening up, the people forced it to do it immediately. This shows how much more sensitive and democratic the Chinese meritocracy is compared to Western s.c. "democracies".
6) When the US dictated Western politics turned "green", China had already a long history of green tech, and therefore started exporting its superior products, only to be stopped by unforeseeable tariffs, sanctions etc. - and then accused of "over production" while Western consumers were denied the best tech.
Btw, most of China's alleged "censorship" and "authoritarian behavior" would better apply to US itself. Moreover, most of it is now a result of US open economic and financial war against China. Why wouldn't China defend itself against a criminal embezzler who sees China as a "threat" to US continuing dollar criminality.
And talking about the rights and freedom of individuals one may note that e.g. personal signal jammers used for protecting privacy are legal in China but forbidden in US where only officials incl. spy agencies are allowed to use the against individuals. And talking about legal rights, in US and UK there's an enormous cost barrier for poorer people to go to court if they may lose the case, whereas in China there's not.
etc.etc.
How US robs the world - click the bomb to release it!
Peter Klevius: Making the bleeding obviously biased The Apprentice was commercially perfect in utilizing hate before election, but also killing "democracy", because it might well be favoring Trump precisely because it appears to many voters as the lowest of campaign tricks. A more even take would have been a similar film on Harris - tentatively called The Bedfellow. However, empty-headed Harris may well be more dangerous for the world than deal maker Trump.
Our authoritarian and gun owning world dictator $-freeloade US is now mentally ill because of PTS caused by its gigantic dollar fraud 1971. Last time the petrodollar deal with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family rescued US from bankruptcy - although not from its embezzlement crime. However, today China's rise ahead of US will inevitably challenge the only peg the dollar now rests on, i.e. trust.
US, not China, should be ranked last in the world in the US made "ranking" for internet freedom due to US all-pervading online surveillance and spying. It's blatantly wrong to accuse China for defending itself against US cyber attacks etc. aggression.
The historic roots of US "China threat" lies rest on US 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act and US 1971 dollar theft.
Although it's true in the sense that it's true that the police constitutes a "threat" to a criminal.
US original "China threat", the Chinese Expulsion Act of 1882, got a boost when the chickens of US 1971 dollar theft are coming home to roost because of China's R&D progress, which leads to US inevitably losing its stolen hegemony. Since Nixon 1971 stole the world dollar, US has prospered on being able to print fiat money for itself - paid by the world dollar which is also controlled by US - without having to bother about deficit, unlike other countries. However, because China is now taking back its historical role as the world's super power - after the Western caused Maoist disaster - US now exports its self-inflicted "China threat" on its "allies" in hope of them saving US from its downfall.
Why would China hurt its customers?! Why wouldn't US militarize its tech monopoly when it loses its customers?!
The "China threat" is a continuation of US shameful Chinese Expulsion Act 1882 - added with US desperation of losing its 1971 stolen $-hegemony.
Peter Klevius bets that US would still face the same "problem" with China even if it was governed exactly as US. After all, the "threat" to US stolen (1971-) dollar hegemony would still loom large. However, a due lack of meritocracy would by necessity then lower innovation also in China - although not even close as low as in US.
Whereas China has been the technological leader through all of history and prehistory from pottery to paper, printing, cannons etc., US has imported all of its, incl. people and those "innovations" it has bought and monopolized with its counterfeited dollar.
Comments
Post a Comment