Peter Klevius: 2013, against US promise 1996, Obama opened up for US nukes on Crimea, which caused Russia's annexation 2014 after a majority of Crimeans asked for it. Today $-freeloader (since 1971) US politics is all about China's tech superiority.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
US compensated for its tech inferiority against Japan with stolen $ and tariffs.
1982
Honda was the world leader in motorbikes when "American icon"* H-D went
bankrupt but was rescued by the US government! Today 12 times bigger
China is the undisputed* tech leader.
* The "special" noise from an outdated old engine, and a criminal "outlaw" imago of "freedom" targeted simple minde souls to buy this unreliable noisy polluter.
** In an industrial mini format H-D represents a deception which conflates emotions with tech. However. yjr same is true for the whole "American" concept - both domestically and abroad. However, it's no coincidence that US went bankrupt at the time of the Moon landing.
The world needs China's superior* tech - not US militaristic use of useful idiots.
*
"US tech": 1. US blocks Dutch ASML from exporting to China chip
machines US itself cant't make, and 2. reusable Falcon 9 made by a
South-African - although China has already made its own successul test.
From a friendly "review" with Peter Klevius comments in brackets: Pros:
The unique and dramatic (loud and irregular as an early T-Ford)
signature roaring-engine sound. Makes you a part of a large (criminal or
simply stupid) community of Harley-Davidson riders who regularly engage
in social rides and charity events. H-D motorcycles are (poor quality)
straightforward, low (but frequent) maintenance, and easy (old) to work
on. H-D specializes in (and miserably fails) making comfortable,
stylish, and fun-to-ride cruiser bikes. The surplus of part availability
(because of frequent repair needs) makes H-D easy to repair and keeps
them on the road for decades (i.e. poor outdated tech). H-D bikes played
a significant role in both world wars, making them a part of American
(US - not the rest of America) History. Cons: H-D motorcycles are
set up differently (what an understatement) than many European and
Japanese motorcycles, meaning that certain services and repairs require
specialized knowledge of H-D bikes. Enthusiasts of other motorcycle
manufacturers are often disappointed by H-D performance and reliability
specs for the price point. H-D parts, accessories, and apparel is
overpriced, which fans say makes it seem like you’re paying for the name
more than anything else. Harley Davidson motorcycles are more expensive
than other bikes while offering fewer features.
How US robs the world- release the bomb!
Finnish disinformation
Peter Klevius on how president Kekkonen 1961 against the will of socialdemocrats (led by a war criminal*), stopped Nato's (led by a Nazi war criminal**) efforts to change Finland's lucrative and peaceful "Finlandization" into hostile militarization*.
*
Väinö Tanner was sentenced five and a half year for war crimes 1946 but
pardoned 1948 by the anti-democratic right wing (the National Coalition
Party) president Paasikivi who had opposed going to war against Russia
together with the Nazis. After WW2 it of course became evident that even
Finland was responsible for fighting on the Nazi side. The London
Charter August 8, 1945 defined three types of crimes: war crimes, crimes
against peace and crimes against humanity. However, Finland got the
privilege of handling the process itself, and in September 11, the
parliament passed a law enabling prosecution of those responsible for
the war. Tanner was found guilty of 'misuse of official authority to the
detriment of the nation'. However, today the opposite is true and hurts
the whole of Europe. Why isn't former PM Sanna Marin prosecuted for
misuse of official authority to the detriment of the nation?! Ilkka
Tanner, grandson of the Social Democratic Party wartime minister Väinö
Tanner, requested annulment of the 1946 judgment by which Väinö Tanner
had been declared guilty of “misuse of official authority to the
detriment of the nation”, as well as the annulment of his five and a
half-year prison sentence. The European Court of Human Rights, by a
committee of three judges including the Finnish judge, declared the
application inadmissible on 23 February 2010. The basis of
incompatibility evoked in the decision was that of ratione personae,
i.e. the appellant could not be considered a victim of a violation in
the sense of Article 34 of the ECHR. It also states without ambiguity
that Finland ’s military activity in the Soviet Union fulfilled the
material elements of
crimes against peace, as understood in international law at the time of the trial.
** A Nazi war criminal internee from 1945 to 1947 when he was released by US, Adolf Heusinger testified during the Nuremberg Trials in a US setup to utilizing instead of hanging him. So 1961, he was appointed Chairman of the NATO Military Committee in Washington, DC, where he served until 1964 when he retired. He was, according to news reports, wanted by Russia in the early 1960s for war crimes committed in the occupied Soviet territories. During the war he bore responsibility for the systematic killings of civilians in Belarus as part of antipartisan operations. The fact that he never faced prosecution is shameful.
Finland again picked the wrong "ally"!
President Urho Kekkonen and Peter Klevius mother who served in the Finnish army during the war, would turn in their graves if knowing what Sanna Marin did as a PM!
Urho Kekkonen, dominant Finnish politician from 1936 to 1982 (of which 5 yrs as PM and 26 yrs as president) - outsmarted UK/US "imtelligence" and efforts to destroy the peaceful and lucrative "Finlandization" after WW2. He was the very opposite to e.g. PM Sanna Marin whom US easily got to betray, endanger and make the Finns poorer.
Peter Klevius warning to Swedes and Finns: Like useful idiots you're misled to limit and endanger your future by following criminal and desperate $-thief US fascist war for survival - which spells war against non-criminal and non-fascist China which stands for clean tech and peaceful meritocracy instead of warmongering $-thief (1971) US.
$-freeloader US is now a malign cancer tumour in the world because of its 1971 $-embezzlement (the "exorbitant privilege" which after the 1971 $-theft made it possible for US to counterfeit fiat dollar despite trade deficit in a way no other central bank could because they paid the price for US theft) which it can't keep up any longer because of China's overwhelmiong R&D success, which in fact is the very opposite to "threat" precisely because China has everything to win on trade and cooperation while the opposite is tru about US - unless it changes its detrimental behavior.
Right wing and Russia friendly Finland's president Urho Kekkonen as godfather for the baby of Peter Klevius' sister Tytti Kotilainen* who was a public Communist**.
* Her son Teja Kotilainen is making a TV-series about Peter Klevius mother.
** Urho Kekkonen. who first chased Communists, later became a keen anti-fascist and made a peaceful and prosperous relation with Russia possible. Although US called it "Finlandization", it also helped Sweden keeping its neutrality. But it all changed when PM Sanna Marin betrayed both her party and her country by suddenly (long before Russia's invasion in Ukraine) buying UK nukes (F-35) and opening up for Nato membership (and therefore also US military DCA nuke occupation), she also helped crashing Sweden's neutrality.
Peter Klevius: This is Finnish warmongering neo-fascism, i.e. brainwashing (or worse). Last time Finns were lured to ally the Nazis - today they've fallen prey to desperate $-thief (since 1971) US which is losing its stolen hegemony because of China's R&D superiority. That's why US subju-gates its "allies" via dumb (or worse) politicians.
Yes, US may look ok in the only heavily distorted channels available, i.e. the US monopolized/manipulized, controlled, spied, and censored disinformation web where essentially almost everything is anti-China. How could ordinary busy people possibly have any chance then to get any decent China facts?!
The young Kekkonen worked for the security police EK between 1921 and 1927, where he became acquainted with anti-communist policing. During this time he also met his future wife, Sylvi Salome Uino (12 March 1900 – 2 December 1974),[9] a typist at the police station.
The war-responsibility trials in Finland (Finnish: Sotasyyllisyysoikeudenkäynti, Swedish: Krigsansvarighetsprocessen) were trials of the Finnish wartime leaders held responsible for "definitely influencing Finland in getting into a war with the Soviet Union and United Kingdom in 1941 or preventing peace" during the Continuation War,
Post-WW2 saw Finland taking a profitable middle ground between the western and eastern blocs.
Based on a 2016 study, the Russian market is for Finnish export companies A very important trade object, due to the great opportunities it offers. Success is based on perseverance, high product quality and good networks in Russia.
As a former secret police Kekkonen knew how to ulilize foreign agents.
UK "intelligence" tried to influence Finland’s president Kekkonen through his English Teacher
Western powers took advantage of the secret communication with the Finnish President Urho Kekkonen and tried to influence his thoughts during the Cold War.
New research reveals that Finnish President Urho Kekkonen had a closer relationship with Western Intelligence than was previously known. This is evident from Mikko Virta’s research. It examines relations with the West and especially with the Western intelligence services during the Cold War. The investigation also reveals a secret information operation, called Operation Thread, targeted at President Kekkonen by the British. The operation was not previously known about.
Peter Klevius: To better understand the background to the Ukraine war, Obama's 2013 plan to place US (Nato) nukes in Sevastopol, Crimea, may be helpful.
Howard Friel Mar 14, 2014: The Siege of Sevastopol Threatens War
A U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED) "Resource Summary" for Fiscal Year 2013 says this about its policy toward Europe in 2013:
The objective of the Endowment in most of the countries where it is active in the Europe region is "helping new democracies to succeed." For Eastern and Southeastern Europe, this goal is best met through these countries' accession to the European Union and NATO (italics added).
In the same paragraph, the NED lists Ukraine as its first priority in Europe as follows: "In the Europe region, the 2013 priority countries will include Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Kosovo."
Likewise, a U.S. State Department "Budget Summary" for Fiscal Year 2013 says this about Ukraine:
U.S. assistance aims to promote the development of a democratic, prosperous, and secure Ukraine, fully integrated into the Euro-Atlantic community as it struggles to overcome the effects of the global financial crisis and worsening backsliding on democratic reform (italics added).
Given that the Russian Black Sea Fleet is based in Sevastopol, Crimea, which as of now is part of Ukraine, my question is: How does the Obama administration expect Russia to respond to the U.S.-led effort to "integrate" Ukraine, including the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, into the NATO military alliance? Isn't this where the provocation lies? Why not avert a military showdown with Russia, which is reportedly massing troops near Crimea, and thus avoid the risk of major war, by letting the citizens of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea decide whether to secede from Ukraine, just as the U.S. supported the will of the people in Kosovo to secede from Serbia in 2008?
Suppose Russian (or Soviet) policymakers had issued documents for Fiscal Year 1941 in which they asserted their intention to "integrate" the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, into Russia's economic, political, and military dominion. At the time, Hawaii was an American colony which, unlike Crimea and Sevastopol with Russia, had no ethnic, cultural, or historical affinity with the mainland United States. Wouldn't most Russians in 1941 have assumed that they would be risking war with the United States by claiming their intention to attain and integrate the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor into the Soviet Union?
Suppose further that Russia had spent millions of dollars in FY 1941 on vaguely suspicious activities in Hawaii under the guise of a "National Endowment for Democracy" and an "Economic Support Fund" to effect the economic, political, and military integration of the Pearl Harbor naval base with Russia?
In fact, for FY 2013, the State Department, for Ukraine alone, budgeted $54 million for "An Economic Support Fund," $7.9 million for USAID, $4.1 million for "International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement," $1.9 million for "International Military Education and Training," and $7 million for "Foreign Military Financing." This is in addition to the $9.5 million that the NED budgeted for its "Central & Eastern Europe" programs in 2013, of which Ukraine is the number one priority. This amounts to at least $75 million of U.S. involvement in Ukraine, where the head of state was just overthrown as explicitly supported by the United States.
Suppose also that you wake up one morning, say Wednesday (March 12, 2013), to the following headline in the New York Times: "Obama Team Debates How to Punish Russia." This headline and story applies, bizarrely, to a situation where Team Obama was almost certainly involved on one level or another in the destabilization and overthrow of the democratically elected president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, and in the placement of the post-coup, de-facto head of state, Arseniy Yatsenyuk. In addition, President Obama, ahead of any country in Europe, invited the unelected post-coup head of state to the White House for consultations about matters which, for the most part, will no doubt remain secret. Under the circumstances, who should be threatening to punish whom? Yet the Russian government has refrained from issuing any such threats.
The unchallenged gross arrogance and stupidity of so closely identifying the United States with the post-coup, unelected Yatsenyuk, including a visit to the White House yesterday, a mere eighteen days after the U.S.-supported street-ouster of Yanukovych, no doubt will lead to more such conformist reports, including this one in the Times on March 11:
Apparently in an effort to portray the United States as the intransigent party [in post-coup talks], the Kremlin took the unusual step of televising a brief exchange between President Vladimir V. Putin and the Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, in which they complained that Mr. Kerry had spurned an invitation to come to Russia for consultations. The State Department responded by rushing out a statement saying it was the Russians who were not prepared to engage in discussions on the United States' proposals, especially the idea that they meet with officials from the new Ukrainian government.
"Intransigence" in The Twilight Zone of U.S. press coverage of Ukraine is not seen in the American effort to hold talks with Russia hostage to the demand that the Russians sit down with "Yats" after Victoria Nuland -- somehow shortly and presciently before the coup - plotted with her ambassador in Ukraine to have "Yats" take over, whereupon "Yats" took over. Instead, the Russians are described as intransigent for refusing to, in effect, ratify the U.S.-supported coup by meeting with Yatsenyuk.
The fatal flaw here, ideologically speaking, and literally for millions of "others" who pay the price as war dead, is the false patriotism of intellectuals and journalists who persistently follow the lead of the serial insanity of our war-making leaders. In August 1964, the government of North Vietnam denounced the Johnson administration's claims that two U.S. destroyers patrolling the Gulf of Tonkin had been attacked by North Vietnamese boats as "a sheer fabrication by the United States imperialists." China denounced the alleged Gulf of Tonkin incident as "deliberate armed aggression." The Soviet Union also described the incident as "armed aggression" by the United States. Intellectuals and journalists sided with the Johnson administration, as Richard Falk and I detail in our 2004 book, The Record of the Paper, but North Vietnam, China, and the Soviet Union were all correct in their denials and denunciations. Johnson, and to a great extent, the U.S. news media, subsequently led the country to full-blown war in Vietnam.
US deliberate spread of lies about "forced
labor" against sharia muslims in China, is a disaster for clean energy -
and thoroughly debunked by the most authoritive source, i.e. all
muslims world organization OIC. Still, ignorant (or worse) politicians
and media people keep this detrimental propaganda alive, while having no
problem with Israel's war crimes and genocides against non-sharia
muslims.
The world needs China high tech - not US militarism and anti-China disinformation!
Comments
Post a Comment