According to Peter Klevius, who 1992 defined jurisprudence as the 'ultimate science'*, Trump's "hush money" case was made official by the judge's own ruling.

 * Because it starts with the answer (the law) and checks if the case fits the question, i.e. the prosection (1992:43).

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct. 

The essence in the case was blackmailing resting on the foundation of the official nature of the presidential election campaign.

Trump has asked Judge Juan Merchan to dismiss the entire New York criminal case as a result of his November election victory. Judge Merchan didn't rule on that argument. In his ruling, Merchan sided with prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney’s office who said that while the U.S. Supreme Court granted presidents wide latitude in having immunity for presidential actions, the activities for which Trump was convicted were unofficial – not official – conduct.

Peter Klevius: What could be more official than a presidential election?

Merchan wrote in his 41-page ruling that the actions Trump took for which he was convicted were “decidedly personal acts” including falsifying business records that posed “no danger of intrusion on the authority and function of the Executive Branch,” including Trump’s actions as president. Those “unofficial” actions included steps Trump took to falsify records related to payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who was threatening to go public with claims of having had affairs with Trump just before the 2016 election, Merchan concluded.

Peter Klevius: The election campaign was the very (possibly only) fuel to the blackmailing.

Merchan ruled, “It is therefore logical and reasonable to conclude that if the act of falsifying records to cover up the payments so that the public would not be made aware is decidedly an unofficial act, so too should the communications to further that same cover-up be unofficial.”

Peter Klevius: In other words, Merchan nullifies his own ruling. Peter Klevius rests his case.