Peter Klevius R&D and $-analysis: West's delusion about China, and US' desperation to share with its "allies" the consequences of its 1971 world $-theft* and continuing embezzlement, constitute the center of geo-politics today.

* The original dollar was European (Spanish) and after 1944 it was made the world dollar pegged to gold, i.e. eqaully anchored against all other currencies. However, because US cheated by living over its means, i.e. printing more dollar for itself than it had corresponding amount of gold, this led to US being unable to deliver gold against dollar on demand. So Nixon just robbed the world dollar by disconnecting its gold pegging while keeping all control over its printing and use.

US is the bad guy* and China the good (i.e. normal) one - how could anyone miss to see something so obvious? And don't fool yourself by focusing on Trump when the real problem is US 1971 $-theft. Where Biden stupidly thought he could win over China, Trump knows better but wants to use all US stolen means possible - incl. extorion of "allies" and anti-China campaign - to prolong US inevitable economic and hegemonic collapse.

The top duty of the world is now to tell US to behave and settle as a normal nation among ithers - not to willfully and blindfolded support US criminal path.

* Just watch what US has done against Palestinians (tiny Israel is completely dependent on US support). Or Syria etc. around the world! Or consider US rule breaking dictatorshipin trade etc. Or how US spy on non-US citizens around the world while benefiting from all data it collects via its internet and finance monopoly.

There is no "rivalry war" or "US-China trade or tech war". There's only US constantly attacking China, a country that could be a blessing to the rest of the world if not hampered by US and its "allies" racist Sinophobia which can be traced back to the opium wars and US anti-China legislation in the 19th century!

The very fact that US now coerces its less powerful "allies" and others against China with full scale dollar and military threats/attacks, is simply because US (Trump) understands (just like Nixon 1971) that it's losing*.

* So called "experts" who think US or West could compete with China, have all missed the reality, i.e. that China's progress is unstoppable. Moreover, preciseöy because of its superiority China doesn't need to behave like US, but is instead more than open for cooperation that inevitably will benefitless superior countries. 

It's delusional to believe the West can compete with China. So decoupling from China inevitably means that both US and its "allies" will lose access to world leading technology and competence. This is caused by politicians and hits the consumers, i.e. ordinary people whose interest politicians once were supposed to fulfill but are now entangled in s.c. "defense" corporations hunger for profit.

As the anti-Maoist leader (scrutinized by 96 million meritocratic politicians) of the Chinese people's dictatorship, Xi is as far from a Trump/Starmer/Macron type of authoritarian dictator* one can get. Moreover, of China's Congress with 2,296 delegates 27% are women compared to e.g. Japan's 15.7%. The delegates represent China's 96 million active politicians. Women make up some 28% of all members of US Congress (153 of 540 voting and nonvoting members of Congress).

* Both Macron and Starmer lead their countries against the will of the people. France has also used lawfare to eliminate the most popular presidential candidate, and Keir Starmer became a dictator for at least five years without democratic support from the people, thanks to a deeply undemocratic system with which Labour got a qualified majority with only 33% of active voters whom he then even cheated by ruling opposite the will of the voters. And instead of supporting the weak in UK he instead supportsd the US arms industry.

Obama's 2013 threat to place US nukes in Sevastopol started it all. However, Crimea wasn't "occupied" by Russia but asked to be freed from a bullying Ukrainian leadership and overwhelmingly stated in both a US made survey/poll as well as a Russian arranged referendum that it wanted to be annexed to Russia, which was approved in early 2014 - but disapproved by the West. 

US deliberately wanted to stop peaceful cooperation between Russia and the rest of Europe - this is why Biden promised to stop Nord Stream.

 However, US then, also in 2014, imposed sanctions on Russia and arranged a coup d'état and military escalation in Ukraine which started the still ongoing Ukrainian civil war. Further Western military escalation led to the Russian invasion 2022. Now EU and UK plan even more military escalation, i.e. throwing petrol on an already existing fire! UK's unelected leadership thinks it couöd enhance UK's footprint and economic growth on the only branch it could do so without cooperating with China. After all, s.c. "defense" spending is outside consumer scrutiny.

Peter Klevius: Instead of a lasting peace in Ukraine, EU* and UK* want a lasting war. Why? Because both are broke and see arms as growth.

* Kaja Kallas, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, is an extreme Russophobe and former PM of Estonia. As PM she supported persecution of Russians in Estonia. Under her watch Estonian statistics also show that ethnic Russians and Russian-speakers (22% of the population) are disproportionately represented in a number of areas, including:

    83% of persons registered as HIV-positive
    70-85% of prostitutes
    nearly 60% of prison inmates
    98% of injecting drug users
    66.4% of the homeless population in Tallinn

Peter Klevius: What do you think, is it Russian genes or Estonian discrimination? And isn't it insidious of EU top politicians to place Kaja Kallas as the  High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy! Wouldn't she be the least suitable for such a post?!

Peter Klevius wonders how dumb* BBC's "presenter" Anna Foster is? After all, how could she so totally have missed the genocidal background and US meddling in the Ukraine conflict, as well as the fact that it was the threat of placing US/NATO nukes in Ukraine that was unacceptable for Russia and totally at odds with the earlier promise that Ukraine should abstain from mukes?!

* Peter Klevius of course hates to think she is deliberately lying to her listeners.

BBC, other Western media and politicians constantly lie that "Russia invaded despite Ukraine was promised security when it gave up the Soviet nukes". The truth is exactly the opposite, i.e. that Russia attacked precisely because this treaty was broken by the US/NATO push for nukes in Ukraine, starting already in 2013 with Obama's plan to take over Sevastopol and place US nuke on Crimea.  

Listen to this CNN video from 2014 and ask yourself why nothing about it is heard on CNN and BBC today.

Ukraine committed genocide against its Russian population, which led to Russia defending them in their understandable wish not to belong to Ukraine but to Russia. 

Ther's no denial possible that Ukraine had a Nazi problem. So why are politicians and media looking the other way?!

Listen to this CNN video from 2014 and ask yourself why nothing about it is heard on CNN and BBC today.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 

 

How US robs the world

.