US supported Israel, "defended" its war crimes on BBC, incl. bombing peace negotiators and staff in Qatar by stating 'We're a democracy'! Peter Klevius: Bombing democratically elected Hamas* whose military wing defends* Palestinians just like IDF but with more right!
* US military base in Doha knew about the missiles but didn't protect Qatar but only Israel. IDF and Mossad (CIA associated) are US proxy army and intelligence. Israel is a tiny country with a GDP less than Hong Kong, and would never alone been able to commit the atrocities it has. John Mearsheimer says that due to Israel's occupation and oppression of Palestinians, Hamas had the right to attack Israel. And it wasn't Hamas that committed the worst atrocities during the attack. So this extreme pointing against Hamas seems to fit Israel's genocide agenda because technically Hamas still represents all of the Palestinians in Gaza. After all, Israel's war against Palestinians has never stopped - just compare how Zelensky still "represents" Ukrainians although his presidency ended long ago.
You're a fool (or worse - i.e. a fascist*) if you fall for the demonizing mis- and disinformation about Russia and especially China**, which ultimately rests on US fear of losing its 1971 stolen dollar hegemony.
* Don't you think the Germans who backed the Nazis felt the same Russophobia/anti-Communism and thought that Germany had to increase its defense spending - and increase the territories it could control (compare NATO/EU today).
**
When Xi tries to defuse North Korea this is instead in the West used to
further demonize China. However, China is in every aspect (incl. crime
rate) a better led country than US - the overwhelming opinion of Chinese
people, and US tourists inChina. Moreover, even though Mao rightly is
celebrated for his campaign against the mass-murderer and dictator
Chiang Kai-shek (whom US helped occupy Taiwan) and the Japanese
occupation, when Mao died, so did "Maoism". If you correct for China's
necessary measures against US and its "allies" attacks, as well as for
the fact that China leads in technology - which may lead to China haters
using it as in the case of facial surveillance before this tech became
commonplace also in the West.
When Israel killed at least 62 Palestinians on Sunday, BBC's mediafascists only "reported" that 'two high rise buildings were taken down', while making a big number of Russia's attack where 4 were killed - probably misdirected because of air defense.
A key concept of the UN Charter is non-interference in the domestic affairs of other countries. So why did Ukraine's leadership welcome NATO, well knowing that would alter peace?
Why
didn't Ukraine stop harassing terrorizing, and bombing Russians in
Ukraine since 2014? Why didn't Zelensky stop the genocide* against
Russians in 2019 when he was elected, and the war 2022 when Russia
offered ceasefire and negotiations? And why positive to NATO**
membership, well knowing Russia's red line*?
*
Oppressing Russian language and culture in Ukraine while also attacking
them with military bombardment and terrorizing them with Nazi Ukrainian
militants, all seem to well top China's detention of IS Uyghur
islamists who had raped and slaughtered equally many Chinese as
Israelis, and China's effort to give sharia imprisoned women a chance to
educate and work without bombing them, was declared "genocide" by the
US dictatorship over the West. So the West condemns Palestinian islamism
while applauding Uyghur islamism!
** NATO membership means US
nukes, but US would never have tolerated Russian nukes in Mexico or
Cuba. And no matter what text is in the membership application, there's
no guarantee about whether US will declare the unspecific "armed attack"
as an excuse to place nukes secretly in Nato and DCA countries. After
all, an "armed attack" can include "various forms" of military
"aggression" and "cyber attacks" depending on the context. Moreover, no
one can control when and where US nukes are located and transported
within NATO - not even Rutte.
First Ukraine was declared nuke free, and Russia only rented Sevastopol. Then 2013 US planned to seize it and place its nukes there. Then 2014 Crimeans voted to belong to Russia. Then US toppled the president and supported an 8 year genocidal civil war against Russians, which 2022 led to Russia liberating* the eastern parts.
And now Merz wants the war to continue indefinitely.
Read this if you still feel confused:
Ukraine’s NATO Membership Was Always Russia’s Red Line
by Kyle Anzalone | Apr 28, 2025
Since
2008, the North Atlantic Alliance has been promising to one day add
Ukraine as a member of the bloc. However, Moscow protested Kiev
accession to the alliance, arguing that it would present a major
national security concern for Russia.
While the American
president following Bush did little to make Ukraine a formal member of
the bloc, each subsequent president ramped up U.S. support for Ukraine.
President Joe Biden finally pushed Russian President Vladimir Putin to
invade Ukraine when he began treating Kiev as a de facto member of the
military alliance in 2021.
Putin made several diplomatic
overtures in late 2021 and early 2022, seeking to get Washington to take
NATO membership off the table for Kiev. However, the top officials in
the Biden administration pretended not to understand that Ukraine
joining the bloc was a major red line for Russia. This was the
provocation that ultimately led Putin to order the invasion of Ukraine.
As
Libertarian Institute Director Scott Horton explains in his book
Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the
Catastrophe in Ukraine, it was a long-established fact in Washington
that Kiev becoming a treaty ally with the United States was going to
lead to Russia lashing out at Ukraine. In fact, the best evidence comes
from the CIA Director during Biden’s presidency, William Burns, who in
2008, was serving as an American diplomat in Russia.
The following is an excerpt from Provoked.
Comments
Post a Comment